Here are my arguments against:
- It's only historic because we're backwards. Blacks and women have been elected to leadership positions for years abroad. We're not forging new ground; we're (as usual) showing up to the party late, drunk, and announcing that the party can now begin. Utterly bloody heedless.
- It's irrelevant. If you're voting based on race or gender, you're a fucking nitwit. If I were hiring someone and the HR rep who's supposed to be researching the candidates came and said, "we've got these two candidates. One's Black and the other's a woman. Which one do you want?", I'd fire my HR rep on the spot. The press is the HR rep in this labored analogy. Anyway, point is, I'm not voting for McCain, despite being male and white. It's racist and insulting for the media to keep presuming that Blacks and women are tunnel-vision, single-issue voters.
And if it's frightening to some people that the president might not have naughty bits the same shape or color as their own, it should be catastrophically terror-inducing that he or she might make policy based on dicta handed down by an imaginary being in the sky.
By comparison with that, race or gender shouldn't matter a damn, but you notice we don't hear a lot about that.
1 comment:
What white country has a black leader? Sure this country is very late to the game, but it is exciting and historic. It's not the only important issue, but it *is* a big deal. Where's the love?
Having said that, I'm voting for who I think is the cutest.
Post a Comment